Assessment of management effectiveness of the Tatí Yupi natural reserve, Paraguay, with emphasis on public use management
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32480/rscp.2026.e3119Keywords:
protected areas, Upper Paraná Atlantic Forest, biodiversity conservation, adaptive management, nature-based tourismAbstract
The Tatí Yupi Natural Reserve (RNTY), managed by ITAIPU Binacional, is a strategic protected area within the Upper Paraná Atlantic Forest in Paraguay, recognized for its importance in recreation and nature-based tourism. This study aimed to evaluate the management effectiveness of the RNTY using the Protected Area Management Effectiveness Measurement (MEMAP) methodology, incorporating specific variables related to public use management. A qualitative-quantitative approach was adopted, utilizing interviews with key informants, document review, direct observation, and the collection of verification evidence. The methodological adaptation included nine variables related to visitor resources, public use promotion, facilities, intra and interinstitutional support, public use management, waste management, carrying capacity, and training programs. The overall management effectiveness reached 69.9%, corresponding to a Moderately Satisfactory classification. The highest scores were recorded in the legal (96%), knowledge (90%), and management programs (87.5%) dimensions, whereas threats and illegal uses yielded the lowest results (50%). The public use dimension obtained a score of 66.7%, also corresponding to a Moderately Satisfactory level. The findings suggest that the proposed adaptation represents a relevant methodological contribution for future management effectiveness assessments in protected areas focused on recreation and tourism in Paraguay.
Downloads
References
1. Hockings M, Leverington F, Cook C. Efectividad del manejo de áreas protegidas. En: Worboys GL, Lockwood M, Kothari A, Feary S, Pulsford I, editores. Gobernanza y gestión de áreas protegidas. Bogotá: Editorial Universidad El Bosque; ANU Press; 2019. p. 949-990.
2. Dudley N. Guidelines for applying protected area management categories. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN; 2008.
3. Cifuentes M, Izurieta A, de Faría H. Medición de la efectividad del manejo de áreas protegidas. Turrialba, Costa Rica: CATIE; 2000.
4. Ervin J. Rapid assessment and prioritization of protected area management (RAPPAM) methodology. Gland, Switzerland: WWF; 2003.
5. Stolton S, Hockings M, Dudley N, MacKinnon K, Whitten T, Leverington F. Management effectiveness tracking tool: reporting progress at protected area sites. 2nd ed. Gland, Switzerland: WWF International; 2007.
6. MADES, PNUD. Plan Estratégico del Sistema Nacional de Áreas Silvestres Protegidas del Paraguay (SINASIP) 2020-2030. Proyecto Bosques para el Crecimiento Sostenible. Asunción, Paraguay: MADES/PNUD; 2020.
7. Amarilla Rodríguez SM, Pinazzo J, Pérez de Molas LF, Villalba Marín LJ, Peralta-Kulik N. Estado del arte en la medición de la efectividad de manejo de las áreas protegidas del Paraguay. En: Salas J, Soilán LC, Grabowski CJ, editores. Libro de resúmenes del VI Congreso Nacional de Ciencias Agrarias. San Lorenzo, Paraguay: FCA, UNA; 2025. p. 23. Disponible en: https://www.agr.una.py/wp/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/WEB-01-LIBRO-DE-RESUMENES-2025_up.pdf
8. Espínola-Torres MS, Amarilla-Rodríguez SM, Pinazzo J. Planes de manejo de las áreas silvestres protegidas en Paraguay: un análisis histórico. Rev Cienc Ambient. 2020;54(1):177-189. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.15359/rca.54-1.10
9. ITAIPU Binacional. Resolución RDE N° 052/84 sobre creación, operación y vigilancia de las reservas biológicas de ITABO, Limoy y Tatí Yupi en el área del embalse de ITAIPU. Hernandarias, Paraguay: ITAIPU Binacional; 1984.
10. ITAIPU Binacional. Plan de manejo de la Reserva Natural Tatí Yupi 2024-2028. Hernandarias, Paraguay: ITAIPU Binacional; 2023.
11. Olson DM, Dinerstein E, Wikramanayake ED, Burgess ND, Powell GVN, Underwood EC, et al. Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: A new map of life on earth. BioScience. 2001;51(11):933-938. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0933:TEOTWA]2.0.CO;2
12. Dinerstein E, Olson D, Joshi A, Vynne C, Burgess ND, Wikramanayake E, et al. An ecoregion-based approach to protecting half the terrestrial realm. BioScience. 2017;67(6):534-545. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/bix014
13. Ribeiro MC, Metzger JP, Martensen AC, Ponzoni FJ, Hirota MM. The Brazilian Atlantic Forest: how much is left, and how is the remaining forest distributed? Implications for conservation. Biol Conserv. 2009;142(6):1141-1153. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2009.02.021
14. De Lima RAF, Oliveira AA, Pitta G, Gasper AL, Vibrans AC, Chave J, et al. The erosion of biodiversity and biomass in the Atlantic Forest biodiversity hotspot. Nat Commun. 2020;11:6347. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20217-w
15. Fundación Vida Silvestre Argentina, World Wildlife Fund. State of the Atlantic Forest: three countries, 148 million people, one of the richest forests on earth. Puerto Iguazú, Argentina: Fundación Vida Silvestre Argentina; 2017.
16. Da Ponte E, Roch M, Leinenkugel P, Dech S, Kuenzer C. Paraguay’s Atlantic Forest cover loss—satellite-based change detection and fragmentation analysis between 2003 and 2013. Appl Geogr. 2017;79:37-49. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2016.12.005
17. Leung YF, Spenceley A, Hvenegaard G, Buckley R, editores. Tourism and visitor management in protected areas: guidelines for sustainability. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN; 2018.
18. Ferrari S, Berthe C, Navarro V. Efectividad de manejo en reservas naturales urbanas de la Patagonia Austral y recomendaciones para mejorar su gestión turística. TURyDES. 2016;(20). Disponible en: https://revistaturydes.com/index.php/turydes/article/view/1099
19. Teysseire AE, Speake MA, Gil V. Evaluación de la efectividad de manejo de la Reserva Provincial Parque Luro (Argentina). Real Tend Desafíos Tur. 2021;19(2):115-141. Disponible en: https://revele.uncoma.edu.ar/index.php/condet/article/view/3541
20. Eagles PFJ, McCool SF, Haynes CDA. Sustainable tourism in protected areas: guidelines for planning and management. Gland, Switzerland; Cambridge, UK: IUCN; 2002.
21. ITAIPU Binacional. Plan de manejo 2017-2021 de la Reserva Natural Tatí Yupi. Hernandarias, Paraguay: ITAIPU Binacional; 2016.
22. Isnardi EM. Medición de la efectividad de manejo del Refugio Biológico Tatí Yupi y la Reserva Biológica Itabo, Entidad Binacional ITAIPU, Departamento de Alto Paraná, Paraguay [tesis de maestría]. San Lorenzo, Paraguay: Universidad Nacional de Asunción, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; 2012.
23. Kubota VR, Linares-Palomino R, Gregory T, Silva H, Lombardo L, Caballero R, et al. Assessment of stand characteristics and soil of Upper Parana Atlantic Forests (Paraguay) reveals high habitat heterogeneity. J Trop For Sci. 2023;35(3):283-298. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.26525/jtfs2023.35.3.283
24. Kubota VR, Ugawa S. Long-term monitoring reveals dynamic patterns of forest structure and species diversity in the Paraguayan Upper Paraná Atlantic Forest. Écoscience. 2025;31(4):239-250. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/11956860.2025.2481678
25. Peralta-Kulik N, Amarilla Rodríguez SM, Pérez de Molas L, González Villalba J. Approaches to the economic valuation of non-timber products from the Alto Paraná Atlantic forests, Paraguay. Rev Chapingo Ser Cienc For Ambient. 2023;29(3):61-76. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.5154/r.rchscfa.2022.12.085
26. Peralta-Kulik N, Pérez de Molas L, Amarilla Rodríguez SM. Análisis estructural de un bosque de la Ecorregión Alto Paraná, Paraguay. Investig Agrar. 2018;20(2):127-135. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.18004/investig.agrar.2018.diciembre.127-135
27. Quevedo-Fernández ML, Silva-Imas HN, Pérez-de-Molas LF, Gamarra-Ruiz-Díaz LM, González AL, Amarilla-Rodríguez SM, et al. Paraguay: Toward a landscape restoration of the Paraguayan Atlantic Forest. En: Lapin K, et al., editores. Ecological Connectivity of Forest Ecosystems. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2025. p. 591-608. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-82206-3_33
28. Pérez de Molas LF, Mereles Haydar MF. 100 árboles del Cerrado de Paraguay: guía de campo para el reconocimiento de las especies. San Lorenzo, Paraguay: Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional de Asunción; WWF-Paraguay; 2025.
29. Di Bitetti MS, Placci G, Dietz LA. A biodiversity vision for the Upper Paraná Atlantic Forest ecoregion: designing a biodiversity conservation landscape and setting priorities for conservation action. Washington DC, USA: World Wildlife Fund; 2003.
30. Klink CA, Machado RB. Conservation of the Brazilian Cerrado. Conserv Biol. 2005;19(3):707-713. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00702.x
31. Strassburg BBN, Brooks T, Feltran-Barbieri R, Iribarrem A, Crouzeilles R, Loyola R, et al. Moment of truth for the Cerrado hotspot. Nat Ecol Evol. 2017;1:0099. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0099
32. Segovia Villasanti RB, Amarilla Rodríguez SM, Salas Dueñas DA, González Lesme LR. Determinación de la capacidad de carga turística de senderos interpretativos de la Reserva Natural del Bosque Mbaracayú, Paraguay. Rev Soc Cient Parag. 2025;30(2):87-102. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.32480/rscp.2025.30.2.87102
33. ITAIPU Binacional. Proteger, recuperar e promover o uso sustentável dos ecossistemas terrestres, gerir de forma sustentável as florestas, combater a desertificação, deter e reverter a degradação da terra e deter a perda de biodiversidade: estudo de caso Itaipu e o ODS 15. Foz do Iguaçu: ITAIPU Binacional; 2019.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Revista de la Sociedad Científica del Paraguay
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
El/los autores autorizan a la Revista de la Sociedad Científica del Paraguay a publicar y difundir el articulo del cual son autores, por los medios que considere apropiado.
