Epistemic capital and visibility of higher education researchers: a systematic review 2022–2026
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32480/rscp.2026.e3127Keywords:
epistemic capital, researcher visibility, legitimation, recognition, researcher trajectoryAbstract
Epistemic capital has become a relevant category for understanding how higher education researchers acquire legitimacy, authority, and visibility within academic ecosystems increasingly mediated by metrics, digital platforms, collaborative networks, and institutional infrastructures. The general objective was to synthesize the main categories of epistemic capital associated with the visibility of higher education researchers, while the specific objective was to synthesize its main definitions in the scientific literature. A systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA 2020 protocol, through searches in Scopus, ScienceDirect, Wiley, and Taylor & Francis, considering open-access scientific and review articles published in English between 2022 and 2026. After the selection process, 76 scientific articles were analyzed. The results made it possible to identify ten definitions of epistemic capital and organize them into four core areas: legitimation and recognition; knowledge production and validation; researcher agency and career trajectory; and critical and structural categories. It was concluded that epistemic capital is not equivalent merely to productivity, citations, or digital visibility, but rather constitutes a relational, situated, and recognized capacity to produce valid, legitimate, reliable, and influential knowledge.
Downloads
References
1. Katuu S. Building a digital identity to demonstrate impact. Library Hi Tech News. 2025;42(7):21–23. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-05-2025-0075
2. Koch M, Krohmer D, Naab M, Rost D, Trapp M. A matter of definition: Criteria for digital ecosystems. Digital Business. 2022;2:100027. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.digbus.2022.100027
3. Hamadi I. Toward a meta-framework for digital ecosystem concepts: A comparative review on the state of research, concept relationships, and future directions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2026;223:124413. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124413
4. Penadés B, Muñoz T, Vargas B, Chinchilla Z. Mapping scholarly identities: A descriptive study of Spanish ORCID records at the Spanish National Research Council (CSIC). Learned Publishing. 2026;39(1):e2037. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.2037
5. Aktar S, Habiba U, Islam M. From connections to citations: Assessing the influence of Academic Social Networking (ASN) sites on scholarly impact in Bangladesh. Learned Publishing. 2025;39(1):e2030. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.2030
6. Purnama D. The virtual identity and global epistemic inequality on social media: a reflective bibliometric analysis. Cogent Social Sciences. 2026;12(1). Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2026.2629632
7. Hemming P, Arat A. Promoting mindfulness in education: Scientisation, psychology and epistemic capital. Current Sociology. 2025;73(3):321–341. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1177/00113921231223180
8. Huegel M. University scientists’ multiple goals achievement: Social capital and its impact on research performance and research commercialization. Technovation. 2024;135:103043. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103065
9. Basantes A, Naranjo M, Guerra F, Carrascal R, Benavides A. Visibility of scientific production and digital identity of researchers through digital technologies. Educ. Sci. 2022;12(12):926. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12120926
10. Bordons M., Moreno L., González B. ORCID identifier adoption in Spanish scholarly communication: A macro and micro level perspective. Learned Publishing. 2024; 37, e1606. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1606
11. Angulo J, Valdivia C, Rosas K. Enhancing research visibility: A comparative study on the implementation of CRIS systems at Universidad Católica de Santa María and its contrast with other universities. Publications. 2025;13(4):51. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.3390/publications13040051
12. Gromova A, Surina S, Senkane S, Ortega J, Melngalve D, M?rtinsone K. Academic and social impact of creative arts therapies research (2017–2022): A Scopus-based bibliometric and altmetric study. Social Sciences & Humanities Open. 2026;13:102408. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.102408
13. Zhang A. Performing “the scientist,” credibly and authentically: Understanding how scientists manage their self-presentation on social media. Information, Communication & Society. 2025;1-21. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2025.2565313
14. Robertson D, Amarasingam A. How conspiracy theorists argue: Epistemic capital in the QAnon social media sphere. Popular Communication. 2022;20(3):193–207. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/15405702.2022.2050238
15. Polynczuk K. This attack is intended to destroy Poland: Bio-power, conspiratorial knowledge, and the 2020 Women’s Strike in Poland. Popular Communication. 2022;20(3):222–235. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/15405702.2022.2047972
16. Rekola A, & Paloniemi R. Politics of knowledge use: Epistemic governance in marine spatial planning. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning. 2022;24(6):807–821. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2022.2060807
17. Kirilova S, Zoepfl F. Metrics fraud on ResearchGate. Journal of Informetrics. 2025;19(1):101604. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2024.101604
18. Stock W, Reichmann G, Schlögl C. Investigating the research output of institutions. Journal of Informetrics. 2025;19(2):101638. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2025.101638
19. Cicero T. Interpreting bibliometric indicators as the “Blood Tests” of research systems. Publications. 2026;14(1):9. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.3390/publications14010009
20. Bouchard A, Boudry C. Knowledge and use of the ORCID author identifier in France: A national survey. Learned Publishing. 2025;38:e2004. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.2004
21. Söldner J. In-between self-marketing and collaboration: Researcher identity formation in the usage of academic social network sites. Strategic Change. 2023;32(6):209–221. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.2557
22. Lee D, Stvilia B, Hegde N, Malneedi S. Exploring doctoral student researchers’ use and adoption of research information management systems. Library & Information Science Research. 2025;47(3):101369. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2025.101369
23. Marques R, Lopes A, Magalhães A. Academic identities and higher education change: Reviewing the evidence. Educational Research. 2024;66(2):228-244. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2024.2334760
24. Kayas O, Matikonis K, Cranmer E, Pereira J. Socially negotiating privacy boundaries and academic identities. Studies in Higher Education. 2024;49(7):1241-1252. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2023.2262507
25. Jordan K. Academics’ perceptions of research impact and engagement through interactions on social media platforms. Learning, Media and Technology. 2023;48(3):415–428. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2022.2065298
26. Levy M, Piñeiro J, Amarilla Y. La visibilidad de los papers. Reflexiones sobre las implicancias de la internacionalización de la investigación en el caso UNLAM. Rev. Soc. cient. Parag. 2025;30(2):56-66. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.32480/rscp.2025.30.2.5666
27. Romero E, Gomez L, Forstmane L, Ripine C, Dias C. Visibility, Transparency, Feedback and Recognition”: Higher Education Scholars Using Digital Social Networks. Journal of Interactive Media in Education. 2024;1(7):1–15. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.842
28. Scotti K, Jiao C, Gainey M, Bongiovanni E, Slayton E. Charting open science landscapes: A systematized review of US academic libraries’ engagement in open research practices. The Journal of Academic Librarianship. 2025;51(3):103054. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103054
29. Scott R. Supporting the university research enterprise via open access publishing: Case study from a Carnegie Research 2 university. Publications. 2026;14(1):10. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.3390/publications14010010
30. Schöpfel J, Azeroual O. Responsible research assessment and research information management systems. Encyclopedia. 2024;4(2):915-922. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia4020059
31. Sadowski I, Zam?cki ?. Endogeny in measuring research excellence: In-house publishing and conflict of interests in Polish science evaluation. Research Policy. 2025;54(1):105134. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2024.105134
32. Bourdieu P. The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions of the progress of reason. Soc. Sci. Inform. 2009;14(6):19-47. Disponible en: https://economicsociology.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/bourdieu-the-specificity-of-the-scientific-field-and-the-social-conditions-of-the-progress-of-reason.pdf
33. Schirone M. Field, capital, and habitus: The impact of Pierre Bourdieu on bibliometrics. Quantitative Science Studies. 2023;4(1):186-208. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00232
34. Merton R. The Matthew Effect in Science, II: Cumulative Advantage and the Symbolism of Intellectual Property. ISIS. 1988;79:606-623. Disponible en: https://garfield.library.upenn.edu/merton/matthewii.pdf
35. Bertram M, Sundin J, Roche D, Sánchez A, Thoré E, Brodin T. Open science. Current Biology. 2023;33(15):R792–R797. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2023.05.036
36. Hicks D, Wouters P, Waltman L, de Rijcke S, Rafols I. Bibliometría: El Manifiesto de Leiden para las métricas de investigación. Nature. 2015;520:429–431. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1038/520429a
37. Patthi B, Prasad M, Gupta R, Singla A, Kumar J, Dhama K, Ali I, Niraj L. Altmetrics - A Collated Adjunct Beyond Citations for Scholarly Impact: A Systematic Review. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11(6):ZE16-ZE20. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2017/26153.10078
38. Knipp R. Digital scholarship from the periphery: Insights from researchers in Chile on Academia.edu and ResearchGate. Journal of Interactive Media in Education. 2024; 1(9). Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.856
39. Gholampour S, Lim W, Lund B, Noruzi A, Elahi A, Saboury A, Nawaz R, Gholampour B. Does social media contribute to research impact? An Altmetric study of highly-cited marketing research. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence. 2024;35(13-14):1671-1701. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2024.2393339
40. Naciones Unidas. Objetivos y metas de desarrollo sostenible. Disponible en: https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/es/sustainable-development-goals/
41. Calderon E, Flores J, Castillo J, Castillo J, Blanco R, Morin J, Arriaga D, Diarte E. Ten Steps to Conduct a Systematic Review. Cureus. 2023;15(12):e51422. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.51422
42. Britos M. Distribución espacial de triatominos y su relación con factores ambientales y sociales. Una breve revisión sistemática. Rev. Soc. cient. Parag. 2025;30(1):83-9. Disponible en:
https://doi.org/10.32480/rscp.2025.30.1.8393
43. Cevallos G., Ubillús J., Chocobar E. Argumentos a favor de permitir o prohibir el uso de la inteligencia artificial generativa por estudiantes. Una revisión sistemática. European Public & Social Innovation Review. 2025; 11, 1–30. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2026-2155
44. Mieg H, Horrer A, Berndt M, Deicke W, Dinter J, Gess C, Purrer A, Reichow I, Rueß J, Sailer M, Stang T, Fischer M, Zottmann J. Scientific thinking vs. free speech: Introducing the Cascade model for justifying research-based learning to faculty. Frontiers in Education. 2026;10:1650687. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1650687
45. Koch S, Tetley C. What ‘counts’ in international forest policy research? A conference ethnography of valuation practice and habitus in an interdisciplinary social science field. Forest Policy and Economics. 2023;154:103034. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2023.103034
46. Gichuru E, Rukooko A. The co-optation of critique: African universities’ bibliometric contestation within global academic capitalism. Research in Globalization. 2026;12:100330. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resglo.2025.100330
47. Ripatti-Torniainen L, Stevanovic M. University teaching development workshops as sites of joint decision-making: Negotiations of authority in academic cultures. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction. 2023;38:100681. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2022.100681
48. Correa C, Laine M, Larrinaga C. Taking the world seriously: Autonomy, reflexivity and engagement research in social and environmental accounting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 2023;97:102554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2023.102554
49. Pound P. A sociological perspective on the challenges of displacing animal research within academia: The contribution of Bourdieu. NAM Journal. 2025;1:100057. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.namjnl.2025.100057
50. Vlase I, Terian A. The production of gender-specific scholarly literature in Romania: The weak institutionalisation of Gender Studies in higher education. Studies in Higher Education. 2023;48(12):1825–1840. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2023.2215813
51. Vicars M, Arantes J, Mihailidis S. The invisible ink that marks our paths: lived experience perceptions of academic legitimacy. Higher Education Research & Development. 2026;1–15. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2026.2639613
52. Keil M. Climbing the academic ladder: how social class and habitus mediate academic careers. International Studies in Sociology of Education. 2025;1–22. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/09620214.2025.2494099
53. Gustafsson H. A Societal Ecosystem of Knowledge: Extra-Academic Career Trajectories of Docents in the Swedish Humanities, 1876–1927. History of Education. 2026;1–22. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/0046760X.2026.2642231
54. Benz P, Kropp K, Cosmus T, Rossier T. Homologies in fields of cultural production. Evidence from the European scientific field. Poetics. 2024;107:101945. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2024.101945
55. Fitzpatrick J, Palmer M, Barron N, Ofterdinger U, & Comte, J. Underestimating institutional stance persistence in geothermal market stagnation and market-making. Industrial Marketing Management. 2025;131:103–119. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2025.09.006
56. Schmitz A, Schmidt-Wellenburg C, & Volle J. Integrating geometric data analysis and network analysis by iterative reciprocal mapping. The example of the German field of sociology. Poetics. 2025;108:101947. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2024.101947
57. Dai K, Liu Y, Zhang X. Generative AI in higher education: A bibliometric review of emerging trends, power dynamics, and global research landscapes. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence. 2026;10:100544. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2026.100544
58. Arroyo-Machado W., Díaz-Faes A., Herrera-Viedma E., & Costas R. From academic to media capital: To what extent does the scientific reputation of universities translate into Wikipedia attention? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 2024;75(4):423–437. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24856
59. Zembylas M. Bringing intersectionality and (De)Coloniality into dialogue: Theoretical insights and political pathways for decolonizing higher education. Social Sciences & Humanities Open. 2025;12:101772. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101772
60. Uekusa S, Carlton S, Nissen S, Fernandez F, Marlowe J, Ali F, Asres W, Chang G, Elsayed R, Geng J, Gunasekara D, Hur J, Maeno R, Tran M, Zahedi W, May S, Love T. Overcoming and reinforcing linguicism? Language, power and critical reflexivity in a large multilingual research team. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics. 2026;5:100298. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2026.100298
61. Umar A, Mohd Sanusi M. Global imbalances in tropical Cesium-137 bioaccumulation research: A PRISMA-guided bibliometric assessment of geographic and methodological disparities. Environmental Challenges. 2026;22:101387. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2025.101387
62. Ko?ovi? M. Beyond performative decolonization: Epistemic justice in degrowth curricula. Social Sciences & Humanities Open. 2026; 13, 102503. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.102503
63. Torres-Olave B, Barrett A. Collaborating across boundaries: Epistemic humility in science educators’ communities of practice. International Journal of Educational Research. 2025;134:102866. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2025.102866
64. Campbell S, Floristán E, Wolf O, Thornton R, Riva S. Collective writing as survival tool: Mechanisms of reflexivity against neoliberal academia. Emotion, Space and Society. 2024;50:101007. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2024.101007
65. Filippakou O. Managed inclusion and the politics of erasure: Gender governance in higher education under neoliberal authoritarianism. Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies. 2025;1-16. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/10714413.2025.2561265
66. Cronqvist M. Epistemic justice: A twofold mission for human rights and social sustainability in teacher education. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research. 2025;1–11. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2025.2550260
67. Brust C, Taylor R. Resisting Epistemic Injustice: The Responsibilities of College Educators at Historically and Predominantly White Institutions. Educ Theory. 2023;73:551-571. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1111/edth.12593
68. Atias O, Shavit A, Kali Y, Baram-Tsabari A. Deciphering the role of epistemic injustice in school-based citizen science: Sources, implications, and possible ways for mitigation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 2025;62(5):1350–1387. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.22006
69. Donaghy E, Davies D. Stratified massification: higher education expansion and social (in)justice in India. Globalisation, Societies and Education. 2026;1–16. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2025.2608681
70. Gravett K, Ajjawi R, Bearman M, Holloway J, Olson R, Winstone N. Belonging as flickering and in flux in academic work: a collective biography. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education. 2024;37(7):1971–1985. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2023.2258095
71. Abdelghaffar A, Eid L. A critical look at equity in international doctoral education at a distance: A duo's journey. British Journal of Educational Technology. 2025;56:834–851. Disponibilidad en: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13566
72. Moldashev K, Sahimbekov B, Kozhakhmet S. The institutional logics of research commercialisation: Reform, misalignment, and hybridisation. Social Sciences & Humanities Open. 2025;12:102000. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.102000
73. Fraenkel Y, Bamberger A. Bridging higher education research and policy: The role of institutional knowledge brokers. Higher Education Quarterly. 2025;79(4):e70064. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.70064
74. Salo M, Hiedanpää J, Orihuela J, Llerena C, Vetter J. Governmentality in evidence? Evolving rationalities of forest governance in Peru. Land Use Policy. 2023;129:106622. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106622
75. Forsell J, Mankki V. Evidence through the lens of bibliometrics—the case of Finnish higher education admission reform. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy. 2023;9(2):75–85. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2022.2149099
76. Hart B. Performing the epistemorphic in social policy: The case of higher education. Journal of Education Policy. 2026;1–17. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2026.2646220
77. Murphy M, Costa C. The digital public sphere, universities and intellectualising the public. Studies in Higher Education. 2025;1–18. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2025.2500694
78. Gültekin D, S?n?ksaran E. Overconfidence, gender, and authority attribution in algorithmic versus human advice: A cognitive perspective on compliance. Acta Psychologica. 2025;260:105668. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105668
79. Bilfinger L, Brummernhenrich B, Jucks R. On the defensive: reactance and trustworthiness in processing written information about climate change. Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology. 2026;10:100262. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cresp.2026.100262
80. Huang T. Decentralized social networks and the future of free speech online. Computer Law & Security Review. 2024;55:106059. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2024.106059
81. Saucier C, Wack M, Linvill D, Okoronkwo A, Tatineni G, Sezgin A. Content camouflage: How diversified posting patterns influence human detection of AI-enabled social bots. Computers in Human Behavior. 2026;177:108881. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2025.108881
82. Hirvonen N, Multas A, Nygård T, Huotari M. Cognitive authority: A scoping review of empirical research. An Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) paper. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 2025;76(1):155–192. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24942
83. Osborne J, Allchin D. Science literacy in the twenty-first century: Informed trust and the competent outsider. International Journal of Science Education. 2025;47(15–16):2134–2155. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2024.2331980
84. Wright R, Sandlin J, Burdick J. What is critical media literacy in an age of disinformation? New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education. 2023;2023:11–25. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.20485
85. Ou A, Tai K, Wang X. The emergence of academic writers: Multilingual doctoral students’ translanguaging and transpositioning in AI-mediated academic writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2026;79:101613. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101613
86. Stein F. Recruiting help in everyday research work: Epistemic stance taking and accountability in interaction. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction. 2025;51:100890. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2025.100890
87. McKinley J, Zhu D, Thomas N. Structured peer feedback for authorial voice development: A proof-of-concept study with Chinese doctoral writers in the UK. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2025;78:101583. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101583
88. Sales F. Freedom of academic speech (FAS): navigating academic freedom and free speech in Brazil and the U.S. toward a new framework for protecting scholars’ speech. International Journal of Educational Research. 2026;138:102983. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2026.102983
89. Batres-Prieto V, Abbas A. Self-mentions in design area disciplines: A corpus analysis. Heliyon. 2025;11:e41200. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41200
90. Bozb?y?k M, Morton T. Epistemic positioning and knowledge-building in postgraduate neuroscience classroom interaction. Journal of Pragmatics. 2024;232:72–90. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2024.08.009
91. Domínguez E. Reportive evidentiality. A perception-based complement approach to digital discourse in Spanish and English. Journal of Pragmatics. 2022;201:134–148. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.09.011
92. Mathayas N, Krist C. Re-indexing epistemic responsibility: A grammatical analysis of how a teacher made space for students’ epistemic agency. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 2026;63(1):62–82. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.70023.
93. Spangler V, Lindvig K. Living interdisciplinarity: negotiating identity and practice in higher education. Studies in Higher Education. 2026;1–14. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2026.2642293
94. Silva de Sá Bartoluzzio A, Resende de Lima J, Filgueiras F. Boundaries, barriers, or bridges? Unraveling the integration of doctoral students in the accounting academic community. Accounting Education. 2025;34(5):822–853. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2024.2326963
95. Promsiri T. AI and the psychology of educational disruption: Historical patterns and cognitive implications. Acta Psychologica. 2025;260:105637. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105637
96. Lin Z, Sohail A. Recalibrating academic expertise in the age of generative AI. Patterns. 2026;7:101473. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2025.101473
97. Ma X, Li Y, Li P, Dervin F. The impact of GenAI on epistemic construction, friction and regulation: Doctoral researchers’ duoethnography. European Journal of Education. 2026;61(1):e70330. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70330.
98. Pigola A, Fischer B, Marcondes de Moraes G, Meissner D, Yuan Z, Miao Z. Navigating frictions and drivers in international research collaboration – the case of BRICS nations. Technology in Society. 2026;86:103241. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103241
99. Kalocsai C, Fernando O, Tesfaye M, Weiss S, Kuper A, Tinmouth J, Daneman N, Andrade M, Norris M. Sparking justice under the aegis of pragmatism: A mentorship program for Black and Indigenous students in Canadian medicine. Social Science & Medicine. 2025;387:118665. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118665
100. Wang Y, Jiang M, Liu Q, Jin T. Navigating boundaries in international and interdisciplinary research collaboration: Insights from a collaborative autoethnographic exploration. European Journal of Education. 2026;61:e70612. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70612
101. Jadallah C, Ballard H. Learning and Distributed Expertise in Community-Based Science. Science Education. 2025;109:561-578. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21923
102. Ovens A, Wang J, Han J, Philpot R, Shao T, Ye W, Han X, Wang X. Doing trans-national research in physical education: reflections on a China–New Zealand research collaboration. Sport, Education and Society. 2026;31(3):465–479. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2026.2625935
103. Knudsen D, Catasús B, Kaarbøe K. Epistemic control: A case study on managing relevance in a data-driven organization. Critical Perspectives on Accounting. 2025;102:102808. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2025.102808
104. Hayes K, Allen C. Understanding Science Teacher Learning as Situated in Organizational Contexts: Introduction to the Special Issue. Science Education. 2025;109:993-1001. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21960
105. Garah L, Kapon S. The reification of identity narratives in teacher–student discourse during an inquiry project. Science Education. 2024;108:190–222. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21831
106. Larsen L, Cecchini M. Connective and tactfully tactical: Connective tactics and professional authority in doctor-patient relationships. Social Science & Medicine. 2023;326:115924. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115924
107. Heumann M. ‘They don’t know what they’re doing.’ Epistemic divides and rural consciousness in Switzerland. Journal of Rural Studies. 2026;122:103953. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103953
108. van Dael J, Shaw S, Papoutsi C. Experiential caring and the mobilisation of peerhood in group clinics. Social Science & Medicine. 2025;377:118107. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118107
109. Holly Jr. “Being is not knowing”: Cautionary discourse on reflexive sensemaking in engineering education. J Eng Educ. 2025;114:e70020. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.70020
110. Leonardo Z. Teachers as critical anti-intellectuals: Edward Said and educational criticism. Globalisation, Societies and Education. 2025;23(5):1104–1110. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2024.2446730
111. Bauge R, Ryser E, Sunde N, Horsman G. Evaluating the scope of peer review in digital Forensics: Insights from Norway and the U.K. Science & Justice. 2025;65:139–148. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2025.01.005
112. Lo Piano S, Sheikholeslami R, Puy A, Saltelli A. Unpacking the modelling process via sensitivity auditing. Futures. 2022;144:103041. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2022.103041
113. Pasquetto I, Wofford M, Jordan C, Thomer A. Opposing consensus science through scholarly practices: The role of claims maintenance. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 2026;1–16. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.70074
114. Tanchuk N, Taylor R. Personalized Learning with AI Tutors: Assessing and Advancing Epistemic Trustworthiness. Educ Theory. 2025;75:327-353. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1111/edth.70009
115. Standley J. On the special epistemic obligations of the educator. Educ Theory. 2025; 75: 208-226. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1111/edth.70007
116. Etomes S., Molua E. Analysis of the market for Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) and economic returns in Cameroon: An archetypical African economy. Heliyon. 2023;9:e21679. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21679
117. Busch C, Nadile E, Mohammed T, Gin L, Brownell S, Cooper K. The scientific rules, roles, and values that life sciences doctoral students want to see upheld by undergraduate researchers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 2024;61(10):2405–2443. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21965
118. Shaffer J, Stojicic P, McCormick D, Cruz A, Ahmmad Z, Basu G. Training clinicians to be organizers: Expanding professional identities through a year-long Climate Health Organizing Fellowship. Social Science & Medicine. 2025; 381, 118278. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118278
119. Turan P, Yigitoglu N. Between teacher candidates’ reflection and teacher educators’ evaluation: Fluctuations in epistemic (a)symmetry in feedback conversations. Modern Language Journal. 2023;107:1011–1034. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12886
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Revista de la Sociedad Científica del Paraguay
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
El/los autores autorizan a la Revista de la Sociedad Científica del Paraguay a publicar y difundir el articulo del cual son autores, por los medios que considere apropiado.
